Saturday, March 9, 2019
Fitzgerald the Misogynist Essay
At first, the female characters in Fitzgeralds The Great Gatsby seemed to be rather dissimilar. Daisy was the angelic and guileless beauty, Jordan was the androgynous golfer, and myrtle was the sensuous and vivacious seductress. One was from the holy domain above, another from the sinful depths below, and the last from the neutral in between. Seems like a good balance, how eer, as the story progresses, we see more and more that the tiptoe is a f on the wholeen one, and that the human is a demon in disguise. entirely three women in this novel use men in rough form to get what they want. Looking at the depictions of the female sex in this novel, I believe that, yes, Fitzgerald was a misogynist.Daisy is a careless siren who uses every involvement inclined to her by birth to win what she loves, namely attention, adoration, and social status. The only thing that will retort her the three is wealth, and the only thing that can give her wealth is Tom Buchanan. Despite having supposed ly change her mine (Fitzgerald 74) on the button prior to their wedding, Daisy still married Tom Buchanan without so such(prenominal) as a shiver (75), and very eagerly uses her new-found gold and power to debase her way to the top. It is evident that, from Daisys point of view, true love cannot compare to the money and adulation she craves.Upon her reunion with Gatsby, the first in five years, she breaks down into bust because shes never seen suchbeautiful shirts before (89). The beautiful shirts owned by Gatsby have turn up to Daisy that he is even wealthier than Tom, and this fact s finishs Daisy into a deep lament. That is, if she had just stayed with Gatsby from the beginning, cast out be receiving even more attention and adoration than the already bulky amount she possesses at present because Gatsby could have off-keyered her even more than the huge fortune she already holds. Poor, poor girl.Jordan is the least female of the three females, and I believe this is the r eason why Fitzgerald did not have her meet an ill-timed death, destroy familial relations, or come to any other end she could have at the mercy of a woman-hater. Jordan is representative of the wives and daughters who emerged from WWI as androgynous, self-esteemed, and passably misandric new women. When Nick first meets Jordan, she was perceived as balancing something on it her chin which was quite likely to fall (14). Though it isnot directly stated, I think Jordan is balancing men on her chin. New women like Jordan dont subscribe men, and thus they must use men to prove just that.myrtle is the home wrecker of the novel. As a direct result of her intimacy with Tom, she gets herself killed, which leads Wilson into shooting Gatsby, which obviously puts an end to the Gatsby and Daisy affair, the result of which leaves Nick disgusted and breaks it off with Jordan. Besides ruining the lives of everyone around her, Myrtle also meets the most tragic end of all the females in the novel . She is killed on impact in a gruesome car accident, while both Daisy and Jordan are at least left with the prospect of a fresh start. I believe this is because Myrtle is the most feminine of the three. Nick describes her as sensuous, and despite possessing no face or gleam of beauty, there was an immediate perceptible vitality active her as if the nerves of her body were continually smouldering (28). If Fitzgerald was not a misogynist, then how could someone whose vice is simply being too much of a woman deserve an end as graphic as a left breast hanging loose like a flap (131)?This novel is certainly not one of happily ever afters, and I believe the fact that women are portrayed as the causes of all the tragedies within this novel is reason enough to proclaim Fitzgerald as a misogynist.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment